Facebook whistleblower: shareholders would oust Zuckerberg if they could
Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen told The Observer in an interview published on Saturday that she believed the social media company’s shareholders would seek different leadership than its founder and CEO. Mark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergHillicon Valley – Brought to you by Xerox – US crackdown on overseas hacking tools DC AG Adds Facebook’s Zuckerberg to Cambridge Analytica Senator Asks Facebook’s Zuckerberg to Testify at Child Safety Hearing MORE if they could.
âI believe in the rights of shareholders and shareholders, or shareholders without Mark, have been asking for a share, a vote for years. And the reason is that I’m pretty sure shareholders would choose other leadership if they had an option, âHaugen told the outlet.
She also claimed that Zuckerberg had not indicated that he responsibly prioritizes public safety on Facebook.
âHe’s in control. He has no oversight and he has not demonstrated that he is prepared to govern this business at the level necessary for public safety, âshe told The Observer, a partner newspaper of the Guardian.
Haugen’s comments come as Facebook continues to be plagued by a myriad of problems after an initial series launched by the Wall Street Journal, which included documents leaked by the former Facebook product manager, said the social media platform knew Instagram was harmful for some of its younger uses, failed to take action to tackle disinformation about COVID-19, and was not doing enough to fight cartels and traffickers using the platform.
Earlier this month, the former Facebook employee testified against her former employee and warned that Facebook should not get a free pass for decisions it has previously made.
âFacebook shouldn’t get a free pass on the choices it makes to prioritize growth, virality and responsiveness over public safety. They shouldn’t get a free pass because they’re paying their profits right now with our security, âshe said.
Facebook, which has rebuffed criticism from lawmakers and others, said in a statement to the Observer that while it is a company looking to make a profit, it cares about safety.
âAt the heart of these stories is a premise that is wrong. Yes, we are a business and we make a profit, but the idea that we do so at the expense of people’s safety or well-being ignores where our own business interests lie. The truth is, we’ve invested $ 13 billion and have over 40,000 people to do a job keeping people safe on Facebook, âthe company told the Observer.
Facebook told the Observer in its statement that it advocates for more regulation and said that like other social media platforms, “we are constantly making tough decisions between free speech and speech. detrimental, safety and other issues, “which, according to their company, are not done in a” vacuum “.
Since the revelations on the social media giant, Facebook has announced that it will pause Instagram Kids, launching a “Take a Break” feature to pilot that would occasionally encourage teens to take a break from Instagram and incorporate a new feature. that would help adolescents. stop looking at behaviors that âmay not be conducive to their well-beingâ.
La Colline reached out to Facebook for comment.